Editorial & Source Policy
Editorial & Source Policy
The Payroll Handoff publishes practical employer-side explanations of payroll workflows.
Primary-source standard
Claims about Payroll Relief functionality should be verified against current sources such as:
- IRIS Payroll Relief documentation;
- AccountantsWorld product documentation;
- official IRIS announcements;
- official application listings.
Third-party software directories may help identify questions but should not override current first-party documentation when describing product behavior.
Workflow over marketing copy
Product pages often describe what a feature can do.
Our job is to translate that into operational questions:
- Who supplies the information?
- Who is allowed to change it?
- When does it need to happen?
- Who checks it?
- What changes after approval?
Current documentation matters
Payroll systems change frequently.
For example, the IRIS Payroll Relief help center contains 2026 product updates, and recent release notes introduced an in-product IRIS Agent for support questions.
Pages discussing interfaces, deadlines or functionality should therefore include a real Last Reviewed date.
Changing the date without rechecking the underlying documentation is not considered an update.
No invented experiences
We do not write fictional paragraphs such as:
“Sarah, a payroll manager in Ohio, used Payroll Relief and saved ten hours per week.”
unless Sarah is a real, attributable person documented by a reliable source and her experience is relevant.
Community information
Forums and app reviews can reveal genuine user questions.
They are not treated as proof that the software universally behaves in a particular way.
AI-assisted editorial work
AI tools may assist with outlining, organizing research and drafting.
They are not a substitute for source verification.
Google’s current guidance says generative AI can assist with research and structure, but creating many pages without additional user value may violate its scaled-content abuse policies.
Corrections
When documentation changes materially, affected pages should be:
- re-researched;
- corrected;
- given a new meaningful review date;
- internally linked to any new article that now owns the changed intent.